ICET 2025 conference submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review process by reviewers. Reviewers are members the conference’s Technical Committee of experts in fields specifically matching the conference topics.

Technical Committee members provide the vital link with the profession that makes the conference a success. The reviews help the Program Committee select which papers to accept and reject. Additionally, your reviews help the authors of papers make their papers and presentations stronger. Finally, your suggestions help the Program Chairs select the outstanding papers.

Criteria for Being a Reviewer
   Holding a doctorate in the relevant field
   Be an established expert in the field
   Having an excellent publications track record in high impact, peer-reviewed journals
   Adequate general knowledge of the sub-fields
   Past experience of reviewing abstracts/ full papers and being in editorial boards
   Fluency in language and grammar

Benefits for Being a Reviewer
   Listing as an Technical Committee member on the conference webpage and in the printed proceedings
   Eligibility for special discount for the registration fee
   Getting an electronic reviewer certificate
   Keep up to date on the researches in your field
   Opportunity to develop your career and critical thinking skills essential to research
   Bolstering of resumes for promotion and/or tenure.

The final decision regarding the selection will be made by the Technical Committee Chair. If you would like to be considered to serve on the Technical Committee, please send your latest CV to E-mail: icet@academic.net.